Experienced Sniper Questions Official Narrative of Trump Assassination Attempt
In a startling disclosure, Dallas Alexander, a seasoned sniper with an illustrious career, has publicly challenged the official account of the recent assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump. Alexander, who served for 14 years in Canada’s elite sniper unit JTF2 – known for holding the world record for the longest confirmed sniper kill – has expressed serious doubts about the capabilities of Thomas Matthew Crooks, the alleged perpetrator.
Alexander believes that it would have been nearly impossible for Crooks to execute such a risky operation without inside help from government or security officials. His extensive experience in providing close protection for high-profile individuals like the Canadian Prime Minister lends credibility to his assertions.
A Glance at Alexander’s Career and Expertise
Dallas Alexander boasts a military career spanning over 17 years, with 14 of those dedicated to serving in the JTF2 special operations unit. During his tenure there, his team set a world record for achieving the longest confirmed sniper kill, demonstrating their superior marksmanship and tactical skills.
Significantly, part of Alexander’s duties involved safeguarding VIPs including the Canadian Prime Minister during visits to volatile regions like Iraq and Afghanistan. This has provided him with an unparalleled understanding of security protocols typically employed to protect high-profile individuals. Consequently, his critique of the attempted assassination on Trump carries significant weight.
Questioning Shooter’s Ability to Infiltrate Venue
“The second I saw that aerial photo of what they were saying happened, it immediately made no sense to me,” Alexander stated. “You cannot, in broad daylight, get onto a rooftop within what looked like maybe a couple of hundred yards. You can’t get into that position with a gun when there’s a president speaking. It cannot be done. You don’t even need to be a sniper to know that it’s the most f—king obvious thing, the most obvious place in the whole world.”
Alexander’s doubts extend beyond the shooter’s ability to infiltrate the venue undetected. He also questioned Crooks’ marksmanship and skill level.
Assessing Shooter’s Skill Level
“If that’s the case and someone is good enough to stalk within 150-200 yards of one of the hardest to stalk targets in the whole world, you’re not going to miss a shot. You’re not going to miss that shot. If you have the skillset to get in there, avoiding all these layers of security, then you will have the skillset to hit that first round. It doesn’t make any sense,” Alexander argued.
Concerns About Inside Assistance
Alexander’s analysis suggests that Crooks must have had inside assistance from either security or government officials. He believes it would be nearly impossible for an untrained individual to bypass multiple layers of security without some degree of help or negligence.
“I’m very familiar with the layout of these types of things and what the jobs should be. And yesterday, what happened, I have no doubt in my mind that the shooter had help from somewhere within an agency, an organization, or the government,” Alexander stated.
Implications and Calls for Further Investigation
Alexander’s statements have sparked concern and calls for a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding the assassination attempt. His credibility as a seasoned sniper and close protection specialist adds significant weight to his claims, which challenge the official narrative and suggest potential security breaches or collusion within government ranks.
If Alexander’s suspicions prove accurate, it could severely impact public trust in the security measures designed to protect elected leaders.
Unanswered Questions Amid Ongoing Investigation
As the investigation into the attempted assassination of former President Trump continues, both the public and security experts eagerly await further developments that may validate or refute Alexander’s claims. The need for a comprehensive and transparent inquiry has never been more pressing.
The outcome of this case will have far-reaching implications for our nation’s security apparatus and public confidence in its ability to safeguard our leaders from harm. Alexander’s intervention has undoubtedly added a layer of complexity to this unfolding story, leaving many unanswered questions that require thorough examination.
Leave a Comment