Chamath Says He Got It Wrong
Chamath Palihapitiya, the billionaire investor and co-host of the All-In podcast, told CNBC this week that he used to suffer from what he called Trump Derangement Syndrome. That is not exactly a medical diagnosis, though give the credentialed class enough time and grant money and they may try. Palihapitiya said his view changed after he went back to original source material instead of relying on media summaries. In particular, he said he watched the Charlottesville remarks for himself and concluded that Trump “didn’t say half the things they said he said.” He also questioned why media figures and political voices had, in his view, shaped the story in a way that damaged Trump’s character.
The CNBC Moment Drew Attention
During the appearance, Palihapitiya said many people are being “lazy and reductive” when they refuse to examine what was actually said. He told viewers that after he admitted on his podcast that he had been wrong, Trump called him. Palihapitiya said that after the call, he told his wife, “We got it totally, totally wrong. We were lied to.” That is a rather large admission from someone in elite business circles, where saying anything kind about Trump can be treated like bringing a leaf blower into a library. The larger point was simple: look at the receipts before adopting the approved group opinion.
Another Clip Took Aim At Political Refusal
A second clip from the same CNBC segment focused on what Palihapitiya described as irrational resistance to anything linked to Trump. He criticized the idea of refusing to open a savings account for a child simply because it was associated with the president, calling that reaction “insane.” His argument was not complicated, which may be why it was so dangerous to the professional overcomplicators. If a policy helps your family, rejecting it because the wrong politician touched it is not moral courage. It is branding, but with worse math.
A Lesson In Checking The Tape
Palihapitiya’s comments landed because they challenged a familiar system. First comes the edited claim, then the panel discussion, then the social media pile-on, and finally the quiet discovery that the original clip was more complicated than advertised. By then, the narrative has already moved into a nice condo with a view. His message was not that every voter must like Trump. It was that adults should be able to examine the record before letting media filters do all the thinking. In a country drowning in “context,” watching the source material is starting to look downright rebellious.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
Leave a Comment