Federal Agents Get a New Election Assignment
President Trump has ordered a voter fraud crackdown in nine states, according to the report, with the effort set to begin Tuesday. Homeland Security Investigations, the investigative arm of ICE, will launch what officials called a “coordinated criminal voter fraud surge initiative to pursue investigative leads, conduct field interviews, and support timely prosecutorial review.” The states named are Washington, Wisconsin, Missouri, Georgia, California, Pennsylvania, Nevada, New York, and Connecticut. Agents will be authorized to follow investigative leads through mid-October, which places the operation squarely inside the early heat of midterm season. Washington does enjoy timing things for maximum shouting.
The 250,000-Name Claim Behind the Push
The move follows earlier claims from DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin that more than 250,000 potential noncitizens were found on voter rolls in four states. In July, Mullin sent letters to California Secretary of State Shirley Weber, New Jersey Secretary of State Dale Caldwell, Nevada Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar, and Pennsylvania Secretary of State Al Schmidt. He said, “Election security is national security,” and added that only Americans should elect American leaders. DHS preliminary reviews claimed possible totals of 190,832 noncitizens registered in California, 35,152 in New Jersey, 15,903 in Nevada, and 14,576 in Pennsylvania. Those are not rounding errors, unless the government found a new math program to fund.
States, Voter Rolls, and the Usual Paper Chase
The Daily Mail, citing CNN, reported that the initial sweep will cover the nine states listed in the operation and that DHS has demanded states hand over voter rolls for audits. Mullin has also reportedly threatened to withhold grant funding from states that refuse to adopt the administration’s election reforms. That sets up a familiar fight: federal agencies demanding records, states guarding their systems, and the public being told to trust the process while nobody can agree what the process even is. If the numbers are wrong, the audits should show it. If the numbers are right, the bureaucracy has some explaining to do.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
Leave a Comment