Michigan Voters Want a Clear Rule
The fight in Michigan is over a proposed citizens-only voting petition backed by Americans for Citizens Only Voting. According to the report, a Remington Group poll found 87% of Michigan voters, split evenly between Democrats and Republicans, opposed non-citizens voting in state elections. That is not exactly a mystery novel ending. Most voters appear to want elections limited to citizens, which is already the sort of basic civics point that used to fit on a schoolhouse poster before every issue needed a legal team, a press shop, and three committees.
The Petition Came With a Very Large Stack of Signatures
Supporters turned in 709,841 signatures for the petition, according to the report. The minimum needed to qualify for the ballot was 446,198, meaning the campaign submitted 59.1% more than the threshold. The petition was delivered on March 4, 2026, more than four months before the July 6 filing deadline and eight months before Election Day. The report says the Bureau of Elections did not release its 1,000-signature sample until July 24, then issued a staff report on August 17 saying the petition was 17 signatures short. That left the campaign 17 days to respond before the August 24 Board of State Canvassers meeting.
Signature Matching Became the Main Battlefield
At the August 24 meeting in Lansing, hundreds of residents reportedly packed the room as the Board of State Canvassers reviewed signatures from the Bureau of Elections sample. Staff had rejected some signatures because they said the petition signatures did not match signatures on file. Audience members objected, noting that signatures can change over time, which is true for anyone who has aged, rushed, bought groceries with a stylus, or signed a receipt on a screen designed by someone who hates handwriting. The report also points to past controversy over Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s guidance on absentee-ballot signature review, saying critics saw a double standard in how strictly signatures were being judged here.
Affidavits Were Used to Challenge Rejections
Attorneys working with Americans for Citizens Only Voting obtained 23 affidavits from people whose signatures had been questioned in the 1,000-signature sample, according to the report. They provided 19 affidavits by the 10 a.m. Saturday deadline and four more later on Saturday, though the report says the exact delivery time for the final four was unclear. The point of those affidavits was simple: the campaign argued that signatures rejected by staff were, in fact, valid. In a race where the staff report said the petition was short by only 17 signatures, every disputed name suddenly mattered a great deal. Bureaucracy does love a narrow margin. It gives everyone a chance to discover the sacred power of paperwork.
The Bigger Fight Is Over Who Controls the Voter File
The report also criticizes the structure of Michigan’s voter-roll system under Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Bureau of Elections Director Jonathan Brater. It says the Bureau of Elections controls the Qualified Voter File, while local clerks can edit only their own city or township records and cannot add a citizenship flag. It also says the Michigan Department of State is the listed state agency for voter-registration SAVE access, not local clerks or county officials. The report further states that the Department of Justice asked for unredacted voter rolls, including dates of birth, driver’s license numbers, and the last four digits of Social Security numbers, but Benson refused, and courts have so far allowed that position to stand. That leaves the same question hanging over the whole dispute: if voters want tighter citizenship checks, who in Lansing is actually willing to let anyone check?
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
Leave a Comment