A Former Democratic Insider Puts It in Writing
Evan Barker, a former Obama intern and longtime Democrat, is preparing to release her memoir, Nothing Left: Confessions of a Democratic Operative. Barker has said she became disenchanted with Democratic leadership after years in the party, including work that she says helped raise tens of millions of dollars. Her account is not a polite little note from the suggestion box. It is a claim from someone who says she lived inside the machine, helped run parts of it, and now believes the machinery was sorting people by identity while calling it justice.
The Wall Street Journal Previewed the Book
Wall Street Journal writer Barton Swaim previewed Barker’s memoir and described a political world filled with ritualized progressive signaling. According to the preview, Barker writes about consultants and activists who openly attacked “whiteness” and “maleness,” even when they were white men themselves. She says some male progressives would praise candidates who looked less like them and more like others, a kind of workplace penance program with better catering. Barker also claims private doubts often vanished the moment a Zoom meeting began, when the pronouns came out and the approved talking points marched in.
The Hiring Claim Is the Sharpest Part
Barker does not present herself as only a witness. She says she took part in the very conduct she now condemns. In the book, according to the Journal preview, she says that while reviewing job applicants, she would search names online to determine race and sex, then discard applicants who appeared to be white men. Barker says she knew it was wrong but felt she “had to do it.” That is the sort of confession that tends to make human resources departments suddenly discover the value of silence, process, and probably a very long lunch.
Barker Says Funding Pressure Drove the Pattern
In an interview on Real America’s Voice, Barker said the public did not know how these incentives worked behind the scenes. She pointed to George Soros’s organization, saying it had pledged to fund only Democratic Party organizations led by people of color for five years. Barker said she personally saw people turned down for jobs because groups believed they needed the “right identity” in leadership or risk losing funding. She called the effect “systemic” and said there was social and peer pressure not to hire white men, especially. These are Barker’s claims, but they are specific enough to deserve more than a nervous cough from party officials.
Equality by Spreadsheet Has Consequences
The central issue is simple: if hiring decisions were shaped by race and sex, then the slogan machine may have run straight into basic fairness and, possibly, employment law. Barker says this was not a random bad habit by one office or one overzealous activist with a ring light. She says it came from high levels of the party and spread through incentives, staffing choices, and funding fears. The modern political class often insists it is building a fairer world, but it has a strange talent for making ordinary people suspect the rules only apply when useful.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
Leave a Comment