In a surprising moment of honesty, Hillary Clinton has openly called for more online censorship. She argues that if social media companies aren’t forced to comply with strict regulations, the left will “lose total control” over what content is shared.
The Need for Regulation
During an interview, Clinton emphasized her stance: “We need to remove the immunity from liability and we need to have guardrails. We need regulation.” This statement raises eyebrows about who gets to decide what should be moderated on these platforms.
Clinton continued by saying, “These platforms… if they don’t moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control.” It’s clear she believes that without heavy oversight, the narrative could slip away from those in power.
A Self-Experiment Gone Wrong?
She referred to our time on the internet as a “big experiment,” suggesting that it hasn’t gone well. Her hope? That upcoming elections will lead us back to a place where families and communities can thrive again—under her vision of control.
The GOP Responds
GOP Senator Eric Schmitt weighed in on Clinton’s comments, stating that “The real Threat to Democracy™ is the Democrats’ unquenchable desire for censorship.” His words reflect a growing concern among conservatives about how far some are willing to go in silencing opposing views.
The Target of Censorship
It’s no secret who Clinton wants targeted with this increased regulation: anyone who disagrees with her or her party. In fact, she recently admitted she didn’t go far enough when labeling Trump supporters as “deplorables.” This admission shows just how dismissive some leaders can be toward millions of Americans who hold different beliefs.
Leave a Comment