FBI Confirms Dismissal of Eight Senior Executives Following Calls for Transparency in January 6th Investigations

Big news is buzzing around the FBI, and it’s not just your typical office gossip. According to former FBI Agent Kyle Seraphin, who’s part of “The Suspendables,” there’s a serious shake-up happening. All Executive Assistant Directors (EADs) were given an ultimatum: resign or face termination by Monday, February 3rd.

That’s right—six EADs are on the chopping block. These positions sit just below the Director and Deputy Director. But wait, there’s more! Seraphin claims that about 25 Special Agents in Charge also received this same threat. That could mean nearly half of the 55 FBI Field Offices across the country are in jeopardy.

In an email reviewed by The Gateway Pundit from acting Director Brian Driscoll, each field office must submit a list of all personnel involved in investigations related to January 6th by noon on February 4th. Talk about pressure!

“We understand there’s a lot of media reporting and rumors surrounding potential changes at the FBI. This includes reporting and rumors about actions that very seriously impact our workforce…”

The memo continues with some serious implications:

“Late this afternoon, I received a memo from the acting Deputy Attorney General notifying me that eight senior FBI executives are to be terminated by specific dates unless these employees have retired beforehand.”

This isn’t just a few people being let go; we’re talking thousands of employees across various investigations tied to January 6th and even terrorism-related cases like United States v Haniyeh. So what does this mean for accountability? Who will be held responsible for how resources have been mismanaged?

The email also acknowledges numerous reports where agents were pulled from critical tasks—like tackling violent crimes or child sex trafficking—to chase down individuals charged with misdemeanors related to January 6th protests. Raids conducted with full tactical teams for minor offenses? Sounds excessive.

And let’s not forget about United States v Haniyeh, which has its roots in terrorism charges against Hamas leaders. Is it really time for the FBI to refocus its priorities? Because if they’re spending so much effort on political investigations while letting real threats slip through their fingers, we’ve got a problem.

This whole situation raises eyebrows and questions about transparency within one of America’s most crucial agencies. With leadership potentially changing hands soon, will we see a shift towards better practices? Or is this just another chapter in an ongoing saga?

The clock is ticking, and we’ll be watching closely as more details unfold.

More Reading

Post navigation

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *