Federal Judge Clashes With DOJ Over Deportations
A federal judge in Boston is making headlines after unleashing a verbal torrent against Trump’s administration over some heated deportation cases. U.S. District Judge William Young accused the administration of going rogue with a so-called ‘unconstitutional conspiracy’ targeting activists, especially those who have spilled venomous anti-American and anti-Semitic rhetoric in university halls.
Young, an 85-year-old Reagan appointee, threw some serious shade at Trump, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. This wasn’t your typical courtroom dialogue. Young was having none of it, declaring the actions a violation of First Amendment rights on U.S. soil.
“There was no policy here,” Young opined, his 40-year courtroom veteran status undeniable. Comparing deportation to past ugly histories, he labeled Trump as ‘authoritarian’ and even conjured images of the Fugitive Slave Act. Talk about drama in the courtroom.
Young’s verbal salvo continued, accusing the Trump team of discriminatory antics. However, the DOJ’s legal eagle, Paul Stone, swooped in with a chilling reality check—Young lacked the jurisdiction to enforce any remedy over deportation procedures. Stone hit Young with a regulatory bombshell: any issues on removal proceedings have to take their ticket to immigration court.
Yet, the plot might thicken. Politico revealed Young might not toss in the towel but might instead persist in challenging the administration’s immigration karate chops.
Leave a Comment